December 2009
From
1st January 2010 all competitions in England, Scotland and Wales will
be applying the FINA rules below in relation to Swimsuits for swimming
(excluding Masters and Open Water) competitions.
Current FINA rule GR 5 SWIMWEAR states:
GR
5.1 The swimwear (swimsuit, cap and goggles) of all competitors shall
be in good moral taste and suitable for the individual sports
disciplines and not to carry any symbol which may be considered
offensive.
GR 5.2 All swimsuits shall be non transparent.
GR
5.3 The referee of a competition has the authority to exclude any
competitor whose swimsuit or body symbols do not comply with this Rule.
BL
8.2 In swimming competitions the competitor must wear only one swimsuit
in one or two pieces. No additional items, like arm bands or leg bands
shall be regarded as parts of a swimsuit
BL 8.3 From January 1,
2010 swimwear for men shall not extend above the navel nor below the
knee, and for women, shall not cover the neck, extend past the
shoulder, nor shall extend below knee. All swimsuits shall be made from
textile materials.
CHANGE TO REGULATION 411 REGARDING COSTUMES
From
1st January 2010 the ASA rules on swimwear/costumes have changed. The
current wording in Regulation 411 (“Costumes”) will no longer apply and
has been replaced by:
411.1 The swimwear (swimsuit, cap
and goggles) of competitors in all competitions shall be in accordance
with the FINA General Rules and Bylaws on swimwear, in force on the
date of the competition.
The above rule applies to swimming, open water swimming and masters swimming competitions.
February 2010
Permitted Swimwear: Announcement for Officials
To
clarify the current FINA rules concerning permitted swimwear for the
disciplines of swimming, open water swimming and masters swimming in
British Swimming competitions:
In addition to complying with
FINA General Rule 5, the swimwear in these competitions must comply
with By-Laws 8.2 and 8.3 concerning the style and material used. This
does not prevent the use of a zip (or other fastening) as this is not
mentioned in these provisions. British Records may be achieved.
However, if a World or European Record is to be claimed then the
swimwear must meet the requirements of the issuing authority. This is
separate from the General Rules and By-Laws and is subject to change at
any time. A list of approved swimsuits can be found on the FINA website.
Further clarification on FINA by-laws on swimwear:
BL 8 SWIMWEAR
BL
8.1 All FINA approved swimwear to be used at the Olympic Games and FINA
World Championships must be approved by FINA at least twelve (12)
months prior to the start of the respective competition. In addition,
it must be available for all competitors by 1st January of the year of
the Olympic Games or FINA World Championships.
BL 8.2 In
swimming competitions the competitor must wear only one swimsuit in one
or two pieces. No additional items, like arm bands or leg bands shall
be regarded as parts of a swimsuit.
BL 8.3 From January 1, 2010
swimwear for men shall not extend above the navel nor below the knee,
and for women, shall not cover the neck, extend past the shoulder, nor
shall extend below knee. All swimsuits shall be made from textile
materials.
BL 8.4 From 1 June 2010, Open Water swimwear for
both men and women shall not cover the neck, extend past the shoulder,
nor shall extend below the ankle. All Open Water swimsuits shall comply
with the FINA Criteria for Materials and Approval Procedures.
BL
8.5 From 15 January 2010, in Masters Pool Swimming competitions the
rules BL 8.1, BL 8.2 and BL 8.3 apply. From 1 June 2010, the rule BL
8.4 applies also for the Masters Open Water competitions.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Rule Interpretation
(From time to time questions are posed to British Swimming/ASA following specific incidents at galas and
competitions. The answers given below have been
provided by a panel of experts.)
Individual Medley
Question 1: In a 200m IM race in a 25m pool what is the correct report for each of these
instances?
Scenario 1: The swimmer completes
4x100m IM followed by another 4x100m IM!
Scenario 2: The swimmer
completes the butterfly and backstroke sections with no problems but then swims
25m Breaststroke followed by 25m freestyle and stops (after 6
lengths).
Answer: In both instances the swimmer did not complete
the event in accordance with SW9.1 and should be disqualified.
SW 9.1 In
individual medley events, the swimmer covers the four swimming strokes in the
following order: Butterfly, Backstroke, Breaststroke and Freestyle. Each of the
strokes must cover one quarter (1/4) of the distance.
Could Scenario 2 have been - Did Not Finish? No, the first infringement came as soon as the swimmer did not swim breaststroke on
the 6th length.
Breaststroke
Question 1: In a breaststroke event, a swimmer was seen to
stand on the bottom and then continue swimming. The swimmer was disqualified
under rule 7.4 because "Leg movements were not on the same horizontal plane".
Was it correct to disqualify the swimmer? Was the correct rule applied?
Answer: The swimmer should have been disqualified. Rule SW7.4 "All movements of the
legs shall be simultaneous and on the same horizontal plane without alternating
movement." An infringement of this rule is a valid reason however, more
appropriately an infringement of SW 7.2 could be considered. "From the beginning
of the first arm stroke after the start and after each turn, the body shall be
on the breast." To stand up the swimmer must have left a position on the breast
- even if standing and leaning forward.
Question 2: A swimmer,
swimming breaststroke during a race, removed her goggles using one hand as they
had moved after the dive. She was disqualified. Was this correct and
why?
Answer: Yes it was correct for the Referee to disqualify the
swimmer for a non-simultaneous arm movement, an infringement of SW7.2
All movements of the arms shall be simultaneous and on the same
horizontal plane without alternating movement.
Question 3: A
swimmer, swimming breaststroke during a race removed her goggles using two hands
in a simultaneous movement whilst pushing the hands forwards during the second
arm stroke. She was not disqualified. Was this correct?
Answer:
Yes, no infringement of the rules had taken place
Question 4: A swimmer,
swimming breaststroke during a race was observed with goggles across the cheeks
following the start as they had moved after the dive. Further down the first
length the Referee observed that the goggles had been removed. She was not disqualified. Was this correct?
Answer: The stroke judge
made no report to the Referee as he had not observed the swimmer during the
process of the goggle removal. It was not known how the goggles were removed.
There could be no disqualification because none of the officials had actually observed any
infringement of the rules.
Question 5 : When can the butterfly kick be performed after the start and turn in
breaststroke?
Answer: FINA Rule SW7.1 has been re-worded to form a more logical
order. In conjunction with the explanation below it is important to remember
the following wording from SW7.2. "From the start and throughout the race the
stroke cycle must be one arm stroke and one leg kick in that order." Any
butterfly kick after the start or each turn does not form part of that stroke
cycle. With that in mind SW7.1 should be read as below.
SW
7.1: After the start and after each turn, the swimmer may take one arm stroke
completely back to the legs during which the swimmer may be submerged. A single
butterfly kick is permitted during the first arm stroke, followed by a
breaststroke kick.
1. A swimmer does not have to perform a
butterfly kick.
2. There can only be one butterfly kick.
3. The
butterfly kick must take place during the first arm stroke.
4. The
butterfly kick if implemented must be performed before and followed by a
breaststroke kick
The
swimmer may perform a butterfly kick at any time from the point that their hands
move from the streamline position after the start or turn outwards and or
backwards all the way to the point at which the hands are "completely back to
the legs" (SW7.1.). The kick must be performed before the arms become stationary. There is no requirement within the rules for the
arms to move continuously.
Update 21/07/2011: The following sentence relating to the butterfly kick at the start/turn has been deleted "This may include the occasion when the arms have reached
the legs and are stationary" and replaced by "The kick must be performed before the arms become stationary."
Question 6: A swimmer competing in a 50m Breaststroke race in a 25m pool touches the wall
with both hands simultaneously at the end of the first length, performs a tumble
turn, leaves the wall with the body on the breast and completes the second
length without further incident. Should the swimmer be
disqualified?
Answer: No - the swimmer may turn in any manner they desire
providing the touch at the completion of the first length is legal and the
swimmer leaves the wall to commence the second length in a legal
position.
(A similar scenario could also cover the Butterfly
stroke.)
Backstroke
Question 1: At the start of a backstroke
race following the command "Take your marks" all swimmers take up their
positions. In so doing the swimmer in lane 2 lifts clear of the water. The
starter gives the starting signal and the race takes place. At the conclusion of
the race it is announced that the swimmer in lane 2 has been disqualified. The
reason given:- the swimmer was not in the water. Should the swimmer
have been disqualified?
Answer: This is a
situation whereby the rules have been interpreted too literally. Fina
Rules provide for two starts:
1. Forward from the starting platform:
SW4.1: The start in Freestyle, Breaststroke, Butterfly and Individual
Medley races shall be with a dive.
2. Backward from the
water:
SW4.2 The start in Backstroke and Medley Relay races shall be from
the water.
SW 6.1 Prior to the starting signal, the swimmers
shall line up in the water facing the starting end, with both hands holding the
starting grips. Standing in or on the gutter or bending the toes over the lip of
the gutter is prohibited.
The backstroke rule above describes the
starting position of the swimmer. There is no requirement for the swimmer to
have some part of the body in the water when the starting signal is given.
The swimmer should not have been disqualified.
Question 2 (added 27/12/2010): A swimmer competing in the 200m Backstroke event in a 25m
pool incorrectly counted his lengths and on nearing completion of the
8th length turned off his back, completed a backstroke turn, pushed off
the wall upon his back before realising his mistake. No report was made to the Referee as the official considered the
swimmer had actually touched the wall with his feet whilst on the back.
Was this correct?
Answer: No. A report should have been made.
It is correct that a swimmer must finish whilst upon the back as per SW
6.5 however the swimmer had actually left the position upon his back at
the end of the 8th length prior to the touch at the finish and
therefore a report should have been made with reference to SW 6.2 which states "At the signal for starting and after turning the swimmer shall
push off and swim upon his back throughout the race except when
executing a turn as set forth in SW 6.4. The normal position on the
back can include a roll movement of the body up to, but not including
90 degrees from horizontal. The position of the head is not relevant."
SW 6.5 Upon the finish of the race the swimmer must touch the wall while on the back in his/her respective lane.
Butterfly
Question 1: Following the start of the girls 9years 25m butterfly one
swimmer dived in too deeply and was seen to push herself off the bottom of the
pool with her hands. The stroke judge believed in so doing she may have
gained some additional forward propulsion. How should
the rules be correctly applied?
Answer: What FINA
rule has been broken here? None!
There is no ruling that references the
hands touching the bottom of the pool. The swimmer has not made any
infringement of the rules. Perhaps it would be prudent to advise her Coach that
further training should be given in relation to the dive start in order to
minimise the risk of injury in the future.
Question 2 (added 27/12/2010): You are an Official at a Swimming Competition and a coach advises you
that his swimmer needs to record a time for 100m Butterfly and proposes
to swim the first 100m of the 200m Freestyle doing Butterfly. Can the
swimmer do this?
Answer: Yes, the swimmer may choose to do this, however they must be
advised that any time recorded either at any intermediate distance or
finish can only be recorded as a Freestyle time.
SW5.1 “Freestyle means that in an event so designated the swimmer may swim any style…..”
The race is a Freestyle race and therefore all times recorded are Freestyle times.
Freestyle
Question 1 (added 27/12/2010): What constitutes a missed turn in
freestyle. Can a swimmer return to the wall following a missed turn?
Answer: SW5.2 states: Some part of the swimmer must touch the wall on completion of each length and at the finish.
“Upon completion of each length the swimmer must touch the wall. The
swimmer may turn in any manner desired as long as contact is made with
the wall at the end of each length of the race. If the swimmer misses the wall whilst turning it is permissible for
that swimmer to go back and touch the wall before continuing the race.
If the swimmer misses the wall and fails to return for the touch it is a violation.”
It must be remembered that in relay events, the team of a swimmer
whose feet lose touch with the starting platform before the preceding
team-mate touches the wall shall be disqualified. (SW10.11) i.e. there is no opportunity to return to the wall/starting platform to re-start.
Single Gender Events
Question: Our club would like to organise
an Open Meet that includes 800m and 1500m Freestyle events but want to swim
males and females together. Can we do this?
Answer: FINA has introduced a new rule SW10.1. "All individual
races must be held as separate gender events." However, it is still possible to run these events as mixed providing they are
age group events. FINA provides the opportunity for Federations to adopt their
own Age Group rules (SWAG 1) i.e. the
competition conditions must state clearly that these are Age Group events and will be
swum as mixed male and female.
Certificate of Swimming Disability and Masters Swimmers (added 27/12/2010)
As you are aware British Swimming issues a Certificate of Swimming
Disability to athletes who have impairments that prevent them from
competing against able bodied competitors. The purpose of the
certificate is to ensure that disabled competitors do not get
disqualified for performing a stroke incorrectly due to their
disability and who:
- have not yet been classified
- do not wish to undergo classification
- do not fit the Functional Classification System
Certification is only given to swimmers with a permanent disability and not swimmers suffering from short term incapacity.
The following information with reference to Record applications should
be noted by all Referees officiating at Masters Competitions.
A number of Masters Swimmers have a Certificate of Swimming Disability.
However such certification is not recognised by LEN or FINA therefore
any swimmer who breaks a European or World Record using the benefit of
an exemption detailed on the certificate may not submit a record
application. Swimmers breaking a British record using the benefit of
an exemption detailed on the certificate may submit their application
to Great Britain. Masters swimmers with a valid Certificate of
Swimming Disability who break a European or World record without using
the benefit of an exemption detailed on the certificate will continue
to have their application processed and forwarded to LEN/FINA as
appropriate.
Reports and Reporting
Question 1 (added 27/12/2010): While a race is taking place a swimmer in the next heat walks
to the side of the pool, splashes himself and wets his goggles. Is this
considered as entering the pool? What constitutes an infringement of
this rule?
Answer: SW 10.9 refers. Any swimmer not entered in a race, who enters the water in
which an event is being conducted before all swimmers therein have
completed the race, shall be disqualified from his next scheduled race
in the meet.
We have all experienced swimmers splashing themselves - and others
around them - prior to a race. It is fairly common practice for
swimmers to wet goggles and
themselves. Where electronic timing is installed it is a good idea to
prevent swimmers from leaning over and either touching another swimmer
or accidently interfering with the timing equipment during a race.
Moving round to the side or using an empty lane should pose no problem.
This is not considered to be an infringement of SW10.9.
It should be noted that some International competitions do provide
swimmers with buckets of water near the starting blocks specifically
for swimmers to use to facilitate this "wetting".
What does constitute an infringement? Any swimmer who actually gets into the pool to wet him/herself whilst a
race is in progress should be disqualified from their next race.
Relays
Question 1 (added 17/2/2011): The inspector of turns at the starting end was adjudicating
the takeovers and monitored the approach of the incoming swimmer with the
outgoing swimmer waiting at the rear of the block. As the incoming swimmer
approached the wall the outgoing swimmer moved forward skipping to the front
edge during which both feet momentarily left the block with some forward
momentum, he landed back on the block before the incoming swimmer touched the
wall. The outgoing swimmer continued to extend into his dive, with his feet in
contact with the block, when the incoming swimmer touched.
The inspector
of turns made no report as he considered the feet were in contact with the block
when the touch was made.
Was this decision correct or should a report
have been made as an infringement of SW10.11?
Answer: SW
10.11 states "In relay events, the team of a swimmer whose feet lose touch with
the starting platform before the preceding team-mate touches the wall shall be
disqualified". Therefore no infringement had taken place as the feet of the
outgoing swimmer were in contact with the starting platform at the time the
incoming swimmer touched the end wall to complete his leg.
Time trials (added 12/3/2011)
Question 1: My son is the only one wanting to swim 100m Breaststroke and
does not want to swim on his own. A friend wants a 100m Butterfly time
so can they swim together?
Answer: No. Each event is a separate event. The Breaststroke and the
Butterfly event must be swum separately even if there is only one
entrant in each.
Question 2: My daughter is the only girl wanting a 50m Freestyle time and
does not want to swim on her own can she swim in an empty lane with the
boys who want a 50 m freestyle time?
Answer: No. SW10.1 All individual races must be held as separate gender events.
Question 3: My daughter is the only swimmer wanting a time trial for 50m
Butterfly and does not want to swim on her own. Can a friend accompany
her swimming freestyle- it does not matter that she can be disqualified
for swimming an incorrect stroke?
No: SW10.16. No pace-making shall be permitted, nor may any devised used or plan adopted which has that effect.